online prescription solutions
online discount medstore
pills online
buy lorazepam without prescription
xanax for sale
buy xanax without prescription
buy ambien without prescription
ambien for sale
buy modafinil without prescription
buy phentermine without prescription
modafinil for sale
phentermine for sale
lorazepam for sale
buy lexotan without prescription
bromazepam for sale
xenical for sale
buy stilnox without prescription
valium for sale
buy prosom without prescription
buy mefenorex without prescription
buy sildenafil citrate without prescription
buy adipex-p without prescription
librium for sale
buy restoril without prescription
buy halazepam without prescription
cephalexin for sale
buy zoloft without prescription
buy renova without prescription
renova for sale
terbinafine for sale
dalmane for sale
buy lormetazepam without prescription
nobrium for sale
buy klonopin without prescription
priligy dapoxetine for sale
buy prednisone without prescription
buy aleram without prescription
buy flomax without prescription
imovane for sale
adipex-p for sale
buy niravam without prescription
seroquel for sale
carisoprodol for sale
buy deltasone without prescription
buy diazepam without prescription
zopiclone for sale
buy imitrex without prescription
testosterone anadoil for sale
buy provigil without prescription
sonata for sale
nimetazepam for sale
buy temazepam without prescription
buy xenical without prescription
buy famvir without prescription
buy seroquel without prescription
rivotril for sale
acyclovir for sale
loprazolam for sale
buy nimetazepam without prescription
buy prozac without prescription
mogadon for sale
viagra for sale
buy valium without prescription
lamisil for sale
camazepam for sale
zithromax for sale
buy clobazam without prescription
buy diflucan without prescription
modalert for sale
diflucan for sale
buy alertec without prescription
buy zyban without prescription
buy serax without prescription
buy medazepam without prescription
buy imovane without prescription
mefenorex for sale
lormetazepam for sale
prednisone for sale
ativan for sale
buy alprazolam without prescription
buy camazepam without prescription
buy nobrium without prescription
mazindol for sale
buy mazindol without prescription
buy mogadon without prescription
buy terbinafine without prescription
diazepam for sale
buy topamax without prescription
cialis for sale
buy tafil-xanor without prescription
buy librium without prescription
buy zithromax without prescription
retin-a for sale
buy lunesta without prescription
serax for sale
restoril for sale
stilnox for sale
lamotrigine for sale

Search


Feed

About Me

Kyle Smith (Twitter: @rkylesmith) is a film critic for The New York Post and the author of the novels Love Monkey and A Christmas Caroline. Type a title in the box above to locate a review. Find an alphabetical listing of The New York Post's recent film reviews here.

Buy Love Monkey for $4! "Hilarious"--Maslin, NY Times. "Exceedingly readable and wickedly funny romantic comedy"--S.F. Chronicle. "Loud and brash, a helluva lot of fun"--Entertainment Weekly. "Engaging romp, laugh-out-loud funny"-CNN. "Shrewd, self-deprecating, oh-so-witty. Smith's ruthless humor knows no bounds"--NPR

Buy A Christmas Caroline for $10! "for those who prefer their sentimentality seasoned with a dash of cynical wit. A quick, enjoyable read...straight out of Devil Wears Prada"--The Wall Street Journal

Rotten Tomatoes
Search Movie/Celeb

Advanced Search
  • Recent Comments

  • Categories

  • « Christian Toto on “W.” | Home | Review: “W.” »

    “W.” To Generate Zzzzs at Box Office

    By Kyle | October 17, 2008

    From Dirty Harry: High-end estimates have the $55 million picture “W.” grossing $12 million this weekend, or maybe as low as $5 million. I can’t picture it cracking $10 million but I expect it will do well in France, where politics and entertainment don’t have the same division they do here. (Picture an entire country with the same taste as New York City.) The film really is only pitched to the most liberal one-fourth of the country, and even in that sector, I expect more people are tired of President Bush than eager to razz him with the kinds of sketches that they can see for free on the Daily Show or “SNL.” Word of mouth is going to be poor also, because the film largely avoids spinning outrageous conspiracy theories like “Fahrenheit 9/11,” a movie that, I remind you, implies that the Bush administration knew about or carried out 9/11 because its approval ratings were falling and it needed something to bring them back up.

    Share/Save/Bookmark

    Topics: Movies, Politics |

    14 Responses to ““W.” To Generate Zzzzs at Box Office”

    1. Hunter Tremayne Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 12:14 pm

      You had to get these stats from that rightwing nutjob site “Dirty Harry?” Try Variety or Hollywood Reporter or Box-Office Mojo or Box-Office Prophets or Len Klady or, you know, some site that actually has a smidgen of credibility rather than the online equivalent of “Archie Bunker’s Place.”

    2. Stephan Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 1:28 pm

      I just read your review of the movie. I have to say, for as much as you complain about how biased the movie is, your review is just as biased in the other direction. You clearly are a Bush supporter, and the movie is clearly a tirade on what has been an abominable administration. Whatever publication let you write this review was obviously not looking for an unbiased, legitimate review.

    3. Jules Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 2:45 pm

      I can’t stand Oliver Stone movies and I can’t stand the idiot Bush. So two reasons not to watch the film.

      Meanwhile, Irish bookies Paddy Power have started paying out to people who bet on Obama.

      The Paloon Factor.

    4. kishke Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 5:27 pm

      You clearly are a Bush supporter,

      Kyle, though is open about his biases, as any reader here knows. Stone, by contrast, pretends he has produced an even-handed film.

    5. kyle Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 6:26 pm

      I never understand why people think they’re being insightful when they say I’m clearly a Bush supporter, or the like. Everyone voted either for or against him. Roger Ebert obviously voted against him. Everyone is biased. Why single me out? I think it’s because readers genuinely can’t compute when a writer expresses anything other than the conventional, liberal wisdom. It’s as if having one percent of film critics take a right-wing point of view is too much to tolerate.

    6. Donnie Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 7:39 pm

      I saw it today and the house was more then half way filled.

      Furthermore I dont see what your so up in arms about? I thought the film did the best it could in showing a fair portrait of the President. It certainly didnt show him as a villian or a fool. Nor was it a hit piece. Quite the contrary. What it did show is a man who tried to do the right thing and failed miserably. That sounds like a pretty human story that almost anyone can identify with. I walked out of the theatre liking Bush alot better than I did walking in.

      What you seem to be upset about is any critcism at all.

      Do you really believe that oil was not even a small factor in the decision to go to war?

    7. James Frazier Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 7:42 pm

      I caught the first showing today. Considering that I live in an Iowa town with a population of 35,000, the theater was healthily crowded. I see lots of movies during the first showing on opening day and few had this many people. But I live in a university town, so perhaps the demographic is stilted towards a decent turnout.

    8. Donnie Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 8:21 pm

      An entire country with the same tastes as NYC? Sounds like heaven. Book me a one way flight with no return ticket.

      Vive le France!

    9. Gussy Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 9:39 pm

      I will not be wasting one cent of my money on a hit piece done on a sitting president. Why hasn’t Stone or anyone else done anything on Bill Clinton, our first white trash president?

    10. kyle Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 10:25 pm

      @Donnie, it is vive la France. Not le France. France is feminine. If you know what I mean.

    11. jic Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 10:34 pm

      or, you know, some site that actually has a smidgen of credibility

      You mean like Nikke Finke, whom Dirty Harry spent over half his post quoting?

    12. Donnie Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 11:12 pm

      I knew it was “la”. Darn it.

      And again I totally disagree that the film was a hit piece nor do I think that anyone being portrayed came off terribly. Not W, not Cheney, not Rumsfeld, and not Wolfowitz.

      The US did go around the UN and did alienate itself from Europe over Iraq. There is no disputing that.

      Stone obviously took artistic liberty with Cheney’s big moment, making the case for Iraq and the middle east in general, but then again, did it? Its venal, yeah, and harsh, but is it illogical? Not at all. We can always use oil. What I think the administration is guilty of most of all is hubris and not really thinking through the consequences of their grab for power nor the means to get it. Thats what I left the film with. W takes the Faustian bargain laid out by some of the men around him, Cheney and Rumsfeld specifically, and like Faust is destroyed by it.

    13. Patrick. Says:
      October 17th, 2008 at 11:38 pm

      I just saw the film in a packed theater in blood-red Indiana. Stone created a very tame and simplistic portrait of Bush. Did it have a slight bias? Yes, but it wasn’t prevalent enough to perceive the film as a direct attack.

    14. Dylan Says:
      October 20th, 2008 at 10:41 am

      “W.” isn’t quite up to the gold standard of “Nixon” (odd, since it was Nixon who took the U.S. dollar off the gold standard…), but it’s a well made film that accomplishes its (rather limited) objectives. I would’ve rather seen a three-hour opus with a bit more operatic grandeur.

      Incidentally, I’m wondering if Dirty Harry would be so kind as to point out where in Moore’s F9/11 it is “[implied] that the Bush administration knew about or carried out 9/11 because its approval ratings were falling and it needed something to bring them back up.”

    Comments