online prescription solutions
online discount medstore
pills online
buy lorazepam without prescription
xanax for sale
buy xanax without prescription
buy ambien without prescription
ambien for sale
buy modafinil without prescription
buy phentermine without prescription
modafinil for sale
phentermine for sale
lorazepam for sale
buy lexotan without prescription
bromazepam for sale
xenical for sale
buy stilnox without prescription
valium for sale
buy prosom without prescription
buy mefenorex without prescription
buy sildenafil citrate without prescription
buy adipex-p without prescription
librium for sale
buy restoril without prescription
buy halazepam without prescription
cephalexin for sale
buy zoloft without prescription
buy renova without prescription
renova for sale
terbinafine for sale
dalmane for sale
buy lormetazepam without prescription
nobrium for sale
buy klonopin without prescription
priligy dapoxetine for sale
buy prednisone without prescription
buy aleram without prescription
buy flomax without prescription
imovane for sale
adipex-p for sale
buy niravam without prescription
seroquel for sale
carisoprodol for sale
buy deltasone without prescription
buy diazepam without prescription
zopiclone for sale
buy imitrex without prescription
testosterone anadoil for sale
buy provigil without prescription
sonata for sale
nimetazepam for sale
buy temazepam without prescription
buy xenical without prescription
buy famvir without prescription
buy seroquel without prescription
rivotril for sale
acyclovir for sale
loprazolam for sale
buy nimetazepam without prescription
buy prozac without prescription
mogadon for sale
viagra for sale
buy valium without prescription
lamisil for sale
camazepam for sale
zithromax for sale
buy clobazam without prescription
buy diflucan without prescription
modalert for sale
diflucan for sale
buy alertec without prescription
buy zyban without prescription
buy serax without prescription
buy medazepam without prescription
buy imovane without prescription
mefenorex for sale
lormetazepam for sale
prednisone for sale
ativan for sale
buy alprazolam without prescription
buy camazepam without prescription
buy nobrium without prescription
mazindol for sale
buy mazindol without prescription
buy mogadon without prescription
buy terbinafine without prescription
diazepam for sale
buy topamax without prescription
cialis for sale
buy tafil-xanor without prescription
buy librium without prescription
buy zithromax without prescription
retin-a for sale
buy lunesta without prescription
serax for sale
restoril for sale
stilnox for sale
lamotrigine for sale



About Me

Kyle Smith (Twitter: @rkylesmith) is a film critic for The New York Post and the author of the novels Love Monkey and A Christmas Caroline. Type a title in the box above to locate a review. Find an alphabetical listing of The New York Post's recent film reviews here.

Buy Love Monkey for $4! "Hilarious"--Maslin, NY Times. "Exceedingly readable and wickedly funny romantic comedy"--S.F. Chronicle. "Loud and brash, a helluva lot of fun"--Entertainment Weekly. "Engaging romp, laugh-out-loud funny"-CNN. "Shrewd, self-deprecating, oh-so-witty. Smith's ruthless humor knows no bounds"--NPR

Buy A Christmas Caroline for $10! "for those who prefer their sentimentality seasoned with a dash of cynical wit. A quick, enjoyable read...straight out of Devil Wears Prada"--The Wall Street Journal

Rotten Tomatoes
Search Movie/Celeb

Advanced Search
  • Recent Comments

  • Categories

  • « “Wonder” Twins Back on Top! | Home | Review: “Boomsday” by Christopher Buckley »

    Review: “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix”

    By Kyle | July 14, 2007



    Running time: 138 minutes
    Rated PG-13 (mild action violence)

    “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix,” the 59th film in the popular series, brought me straight back to one of the most enduring of childhood feelings: boredom.

    It isn’t that the film is bad; it’s predictable little dramas may seem gripping and full of twists if you’re in the under-six age group, the pictures looks nice, and the kids are polite and spirited. I suspect they all have excellent bathing habits and solid dental hygiene. But with the addition of Imelda Staunton as Prof. Dolores Umbrage, who comes in to run a one-woman anti-fun Inquisition at Hogwarts, there are now officially more bad guys than there are members of the New England Patriots. The parade of subsidiary characters can’t do anything to disguise the stasis of a drawn-out story that is just killing time until the final battle between the plucky Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) and the noseless Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes), which is still two movies off. At a climactic moment in this film, which is the shortest of the series but the most sluggish, Harry discovers a surprise prophecy that says that neither he nor Voldemort can survive while the other lives. Wait, you mean the bad guy actually has to be defeated by the good guy, or vice versa? It took 12 hours worth of the various movies to get us here? The only list “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix” is going to top is the rundown of the year’s top Rupert Grint films.

    If you’ve seen any other Harry Potter movie, you’ve seen this one. The foster family is mean to him, Harry is unjustly accused of troublemaking by authorities, there’s some scary magic where the kids point their wands at stuff in the dark and comedy magic where the kids point wands and make bunnies and dogs appear.  The film tells us the legend of the Order of the Phoenix, which is an association of the previous generation of magicians whose example Harry hopes to live up to, but it couldn’t be duller if it were the Order of the Sacramento.

    In the book version of “Phoenix,” Harry was supposedly becoming more complex and moody but in the movie he’s the same old dull-as-a-student-council-president Harry: though he occasionally loses his temper (in a mild, Beaver Cleaver way) because he is being blamed for the death of his friend Cedric and called a liar for saying the evil Voldemort has returned from the dead, he is as usual completely in the right, so it will take the whole movie for the others to acknowledge what we know going in. In the beginning of the movie, Harry is expelled from school, but since we’ve seen why (he used a spell off school grounds, which is against the rules, but only to save the lives of himself and his cousin Dudley, which makes it okay) and since we know Harry is not going to leave Hogwarts to become a carny or take a job sweeping floors at Arby’s, it’s a yawn to watch him undergo accusation and reinstatement. There is some mild interest in the way Voldemort attacks Harry psychologically, by invading his thoughts, but there was something a tad familiar in the way this all-powerful villain tries to seduce the young orphan into ignoring good things and stepping on over to the Dark Side.  And an opportunity is lost when Hogwarts becomes corrupted by evil via the influence of the Ministry that controls it. Instead of this being a mystery that the characters tease out, we’re simply told it has happened, and then we watch many, many examples: Prof. Umbrage nailing her nasty prohibitions against pleasure on every flat surface and demanding that students rat each other out. For about an hour. 

    The pleasure of the books is, I suppose, is in its menagerie of wonderful  characters. But in a 138-minute movie there isn’t space to develop more than seven or eight personalities. Here is a partial list of just the figures who exist to provide Harry counsel, friendship and support: Ron, Hermione, Hagrid, Dumbledore, Mad-Eye Moody, Sirius Black, Snape, Prof. McGonagall, Lupin, Mrs. Weasley, etc., etc., etc. If you’ve read the books, you may look on all of these people as old friends. But on film, some are reduced to giving fly-by performances; a tip of the broomstick and they’re gone.  Bend over to take a sip of your Pepsi, and you’ll miss appearances by three or four Oscar winners. There are so many characters to squeeze in that Harry gets to have a love interest, Cho Chang, for exactly one scene. The rest of the  movie Cho loiters in the background doing nothing, except for the last third, when she is forgotten entirely. And we’re so overstocked with villains that Helena Bonham Carter, as the evil escaped prisoner Bellatrix LeStrange, appears about 85 percent of the way through the movie, cackles briefly and is done a couple of minutes later. If you’ve got Darth Vader, give the audience Darth Vader, not Darth Vader’s assistant’s assistant’s intern. But Volde-vader , as he did in the last film, pops up only for a couple of minutes, then wanders away, which is exactly what you knew was going to happen and exactly what I wanted to do also.


    Topics: Movies |

    5 Responses to “Review: “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix””

    1. Kicking Over My Traces: Harry Potter and the Case of the Blahs Says:
      July 10th, 2007 at 8:40 pm

      [...] Kyle Smith’s is the latest to paint the almost-grown boy wizard in shades of beige: [...]

    2. Allison Says:
      February 7th, 2011 at 2:50 pm

      Close minded people like you will never understand the gripping and intense story of Harry potter.

    3. Michelle Says:
      July 7th, 2011 at 12:47 pm

      That is not true. People like you that have no imagination will never get Harry Potter. Try reading the books sometime. The books are NOTHING like the movies.

    4. Roop234 Says:
      June 13th, 2013 at 8:54 pm

      seriously? how could u say something like that?

    5. You suck Says:
      June 26th, 2013 at 12:54 pm